The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The speakers claims that the quality of cooperation succeeds competition when it comes to leadership in various fields like government, industry, etc. On the other hand competition makes a person bring out his/her best in order to defeat the others. I strongly agree with the author's assertion. My proclivity about the same has been proved with relevant examples in the ensuing paagraphs.
First of all, if we consider a government organisation trying to deal with a specific problem with the help of a hypothetical team of 20 people. The more the cooperation is the more is the syncing between all the brains at work. There would be 20 different brains at same work rather than 20 different brains trying to crush each other in order to be the best. For example the same team can come up with 20 ways to deal with a specific problem by thinking about one problem each, rather than one person trying to crack it all by himself. This makes cooperation a effective as well as a time saving technique for a group.
Secondly, there are many industries and organisations which deal with people and work for various domains and sectors. There is a constant need of integration between these various fields. Cooperation between people from various domains is the only tool that could serve this very purpose elminting the barriers hindering the progress. Managers and team leaders leading the project are burdened with the smooth running of the same which cooperation a key quality in there arsenal.
On the contrary, some people might say that competition brings the best out of an individual under all circumstances. The constant eager to be the best at everything thrown at your way is only awakened by the jist of being the last person standing. For example if everyone in a 100m sprint is given the first price the there will be no motivation for anyone to perform better. This might lead the worlds' progress rate to come to a standstill and no innovations might take place. Moreover, competition between people makes the bar or excellence go higher and higher and thus leading to constant improvement in every field possible.
In a nutshell, I would to sum up that the optimal characteristic that must be instilled in the society's youth to be better leaders for the future should be cooperation not competition.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 41
- issue 16
- argument 16
- argument 16
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
The speakers claims that the quality of cooperation succeed...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t the others. I strongly agree with the authors assertion. My proclivity about the same...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... all by himself. This makes cooperation a effective as well as a time saving tech...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for example, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89593908629 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74127772605 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5147349546 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.526315789 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172136160365 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479139915919 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445770585871 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095411922489 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278551226003 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.