The charts show average levels of participants in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
Task-I
The average standard of enrollment in education and the higher education level of male and female adults in Singapur, over the span of a decade till 2010s, is interpreted by a bar graph and two pie charts.
Overall, the maximum male adults took admission in 2010 in education is depicted by the bar graph, while most of the adults were inclined towards Highschool qualification in 2000, is demonstrated the pie charts.
With regard to the male adults, in 2002, only 9%. males were get admission for education in Singapur, however, In 2010, the male candidates showed an exponential increment in getting enrollment for education with almost 11.5%, which was the highest proportion between male and female adults. Strikingly, the female adults had experienced in continuous and nominal incline 1% from 9% in 2010s. By contrast, in the utter time period males were dominated over the females in term of acquiring education in Singapore between 2000 and 2010.
Probing further, the pie charts reveal that the scholars of primary schools were loose their interest with the pace of time and grabbed a huge decrement of almost 23% and stood at 2.1% in 2010. Interestingly, in 2010, the university qualification was preferred by the pupils at the highest proportion with 32.93%, however, in 2000, the enrollment in higher education the high school qualification was penetrated over Categories as well.
- In most of the education system students are assessed by written examination Do you think it is a good idea or not 95
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 95
- Some people think the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 92
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Males
...h to the male adults, in 2002, only 9%. males were get admission for education in Sin...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...le adults, in 2002, only 9%. males were get admission for education in Singapur, ho...
^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...ntinuous and nominal incline 1% from 9% in 2010s. By contrast, in the utter time period ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...at the scholars of primary schools were loose their interest with the pace of time an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19823788546 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83565650525 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4939812131 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315570817519 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124923932467 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723177860617 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186583069192 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445039986597 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.