The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have continuous assessment over the school year.
What do you think of this trend?
With the prevalence of continuous assessment, including presentations and writing essays, traditional examinations no longer remain its prominence at junior schools and tertiary education. I am in favour of continuous assessment in preference to the traditional one due to the following reasons.
To begin with, harnessing continuous assessment at schools will bring about a plethora of benefits to students and teachers. First and foremost, various pieces of work in the on-going evaluation are likely to help students to steer clear of rote learning. To be more specific, frequent exams, including writing essays and presentations, tend to require students to truly grasp what they have learned, resulting in improving their academic performance. Additionally, the continuous assessment will aid teachers to evaluate students' progress fruitfully. By conducting regular evaluations, it is uncomplicated for lecturers to have a profound understanding of learners' levels, which, in turn, helps teachers make immediate adjustments to better learners' progress.
Furthermore, I am convinced that the education system should reduce the dependence on traditional exams in light of several reasons. Firstly, out-of-date exams might exert severe pressure on learners. This is because a mid-term test usually covers a wide range of sophisticated topics that demand learners to immerse themselves in set texts to study intensively. As a result, arising pressure from acing the test is likely to stress learners, especially those who are young learners at primary or secondary schools. Additionally, traditional exams are inclined to evaluate theoretical knowledge solely. This is because traditional exams tend to focus on checking learners' memory for terminologies, which fails to stimulate learners' creativeness in learning.
In conclusion, the prominence of continuous examinations might continue to take priorities over traditional exams in the years to come. Therefore, it is my firm conviction that the advantages of continuous exams surpass its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | Chrome | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | hsn9600 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | Cooldude | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | sahilrocks11 | 78 | view |
- Some experts suppose that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 84
- The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011 67
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...foremost, various pieces of work in the on-going evaluation are likely to help students ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89632107023 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29122480455 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.785536177 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211784678676 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691853180533 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472066444305 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128211925596 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359754601546 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.