Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Industrial development cause many damages to our environment by throwing emission gases, toxic matter and wastewater. Some people claim that government must have responsibility to protect our environment. However,, others say each person should have certain work to save the planet instead of waiting politicians do it alone. From my point of view, I strongly agree with the idea that every individuals should give their hands to protect nature.
Firstly, there are more than 7 billions people on the planet Earth so that every people can make a huge impact to our environment in various ways. 7 billions people meaning 7 billions actions that affect our atmosphere which can convert the bad status environment to be better. For example, if each person plant a tree each month, there will be trillions trees are new growth for 10 years or twice the number of trees nowadays which will change our air completely. Secondly, if every people stop damaging our environment by using public transport, collecting garbage or reduce the resources that people use every day. For instance, using public transport will decrease the amount of CO2 by 75% if people are driving alone. Last but not least, people should apply new technology which improve the efficiency of every system in their house or decrease the harmfulness of manufacturing process.
On the other hand, authority must consider the environment condition. One of these activity is create the regular which penalize individuals or organizations who have damaged the environment heavily. For example, in Philippine if people cutting trees which is old and high valuable, they can be jailed for 6 years and be finned for P50000. Moreover, some enormous problem such as global warming, exhausted resources and nature disasters must be covered by politics due to they need a investment and long-term plan to reduce that impact to our life.
In conclusion, environment is not been take care by human for several years and it need the take care from people before too late. Both government and citizens should bring out some serious plans to solve this problem. The idea is every steps will better our atmosphere

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ 78 view
2023-05-12 Spring123 61 view
2023-03-03 TLan168 73 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 56 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 11 view
Essays by user Hoang Minh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...lity to protect our environment. However,, others say each person should have cert...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this activity' or 'these activities'?
Suggestion: this activity; these activities
...sider the environment condition. One of these activity is create the regular which penalize in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...ent condition. One of these activity is create the regular which penalize individuals ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...be covered by politics due to they need a investment and long-term plan to reduce...
^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... human for several years and it need the take care from people before too late. B...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11016949153 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67649516207 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573446327684 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2420401644 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862293849618 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299230297659 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430414010395 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631851618492 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682303193562 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.