Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that ordinary citizens do not need to concern and action to protect the environment since all responsibilities are the duties of politicians. Although it seems to be reasonable, I utterly disagree with this view because I contend that both government official and individuals are responsible for environmental problems.
There are two strong methods for politicians to carry out to prevent the environment from pollution. First, they can argue the government to impose strict law on the overuse of plastic products, which will tremendously reduce total plastic waste discharging to the environment. For example, a law that it is compulsory for people to bring their food container to buy food will decrease the number of plastic bags consumed. Another approach is that high-ranking bureaucrats can enforce a heavy punish for deforestation illegal, which will make illegal loggers think twice when they want to cut down trees in forest. In fact, if people are accused of exploiting forest without the exception from national or local authorities, they will be get a long-term imprisonment, they will hesitate before doing.
In terms of individuals, although each person just can do a little for the environment, a group of people can make a strong impact on the environmental protection. For instance, many citizens of Netherlands aware of protecting the natural habitat so they use bicycle and subway trains in their daily travel in lieu of cars. By this way, they contribute an extensive impact on reducing air pollution. Another example can be seen in Nha Trang - a coastal city of Vietnam, it was heavy polluted due to tourist’s trash. However, it have become clearer thanks to volunteers spending their whole summer holiday devoting for cleaning beach or even diving into water to pick up trash.
In conclusion, although politicians have a critical role in protecting environment, individuals also can do a myriad things for environmental problems.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings and people can build houses in their own style What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ted due to tourist’s trash. However, it have become clearer thanks to volunteers spe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'volunteer'.
Suggestion: volunteer
...wever, it have become clearer thanks to volunteers spending their whole summer holiday dev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...nment, individuals also can do a myriad things for environmental problems.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28343949045 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07042393643 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7417725336 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216275908079 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773000256336 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898246092114 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174285975421 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098051521123 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ted due to tourist’s trash. However, it have become clearer thanks to volunteers spe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'volunteer'.
Suggestion: volunteer
...wever, it have become clearer thanks to volunteers spending their whole summer holiday dev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...nment, individuals also can do a myriad things for environmental problems.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28343949045 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07042393643 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7417725336 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216275908079 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773000256336 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898246092114 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174285975421 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098051521123 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.