The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As technology develops, humanity introduces new ways of improving and simplification its life. One of such invention is a car which is nowadays considered to be the most comfortable means of transport, that is why in many countries there are milions of vehicles on the roads. In my view, such state of affairs may be a cause for some actual problems and is to be controlled by the governments.
To begin with, the availability of cars to any class of society not depending on the income level has already resulted in air-pollution, overcrowding in the streets and quite usual car accidents. Gas emissions commited by vehicles led to the lack of fresh air; overcrowded streets caused continious traffic conjestions; thousands of people become victims of car crashes daily. However, safer and more environment-friendly vehicles already exist. Consider, for instance, bicycles: they do not attribute to early listed troubles. The Netherlands as a great example should be mentioned: the government of the country strives to encourage citizens to utilize bikes instead of car in order to decrease negative effects of vehicles. Possibly, this is the reason why the Netherlands is often named as one of the most clear and safe in terms of transport country.
Obviously, the humanity is to deal with consequences of an growing usage of cars, and the way to do is through international laws. Increase of taxes on cars or fuel, for instance, may be a great regulator of car ownership. As an example, Germany has already practiced high taxes on non-ecological vehicles and this experience seems to be effective as the rate of pollution in this country is quite low. In order to capture the whole world (not only particular regions) international law is to introduce in every continent.
To conclude, I feel mankind has to deal with the challenge of the large amount of cars on the roads as it leads to numerous unpleasant consequences. There are two general ways to do it through encouraging other means of transport or introducing laws to decrease availability of cars among society. Moreover, such methods have already been experinced by some countries and effects are beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Nhungvo3901 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | fatemeh fazli | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Sagar Gurung | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Ketan Raj Poudel | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | thoaily | 73 | view |
- Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.To what extent do you 78
- The number of plants and animals is declining Describe the problem and suggest some solutions 57
- In many countries nowadays, young single people no longer stay with their parents until they are married, but leave to study or work somewhere else. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages. 73
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 93
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...umanity is to deal with consequences of an growing usage of cars, and the way to d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for instance, i feel, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08659217877 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13744354714 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555865921788 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1369188655 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272524532233 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799260220598 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655713751137 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165290673927 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353897677379 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.