It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One school of thought holds that public outdoor spaces play an important role in the development of major towns and cities. While this perception could be fraught with pitfalls, I would accept that it is of paramount importance to build several communal places such as squares and parks based on some reasons discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, the option of having this kind of open-air space may lead to an increase in minor infractions. This argument sheds light on numerous detrimental effects such as being a target of criminals that residents might have to face during the time they spend on outdoor activities. To be specific, the famous Nguyen Hue street established in 2018 attracted a large number of visitors to come and have a great time with their family members. As being distracted by the lively pace of out-of-door games and being tightly packed in the space, residents are becoming the victims of pickpockets and losing their money as well as precious things such as jewelry or purses. Moreover, it can also damage the public image of the beauty of Ho Chi Minh city.
On the other hand, there are myriads of compelling reasons as I am convinced that it is beneficial for towns and cities to have outdoor spaces. Firstly, enormous public spaces can be a great way to raise people’s health. There are numerous parks or squares that offer a wide range of free-charge sports equipment and facilities to encourage residents to exercise daily. Therefore, it will both improve the people’s standard of living and provide strong labor for the country. Another evidence to support the first reason is that communal spaces tend to be covered by green trees and foster a greener atmosphere that can help residents get rid of stress and provide an escape for them to relax after a long day of tired working. As a result, it can promote healthy habits regularly and enjoy the peace of living.
In conclusion, although there is still a threat that comes from petty crimes, I believe that the main reason is to promote people's health and reduce pressure to make the way governments install open-air spaces such as squares or parks more effective.
- Governments should make laws about people s nutrition and food choice Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote environments Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ue street established in 2018 attracted a large number of visitors to come and have a great time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87837837838 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53530368828 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9751331201 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19824244727 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641683930857 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534848913067 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118671297463 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641120444917 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.