Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
Whether or not, global tourism has increased so much over the decades that it is argued to have negative impacts on local inhabitants and the environment. This essay will first look at some primary culprits of the problem before suggesting some viable measures that must be applied to resolve it.
International tourism is believed to pose a threat to host nations by many indigenous people and there are two main compelling reasons explaining this trend. The first reason is that it may have an adverse impact on traditional customs and local pursuits. It can be seen that a large volume of tourists may be insensitive towards the feelings of native residents. To simplify, some western visitors coming to Vietnam are rowdy and wear unsuitable clothes, which may have an undesirable influence on the youngsters who imitate immodest and provocative behaviour. Another reason is that holidaymakers often pollute or litter beauty spots and several famous natural wonders. Even tourists behave responsibly, the sheer number of them can spoil the areas by this lack of respect for the local environment.
There are various solutions that could be implemented to tackle the issue. First, it is necessary for governments to adopt stricter legislation on tourism industries. They need to ensure that local operators are responsible for clearing litter and disposing waste in ways that do not harm the environment. Moreover, visitors should be urged to respect the local customs and cultures of the host countries and therefore, be accountable to their destinations’ environments. By taking these actions, the problems would be properly mitigated.
To summarize, only by addressing the concerns of local people will negative attitudes towards international tourism be changed.
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses Agree or Disagree 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth damaging environment Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not, global tourism has increased so much o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds international tourism be changed.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42086330935 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9492279059 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7159999589 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188275474216 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602045729779 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683207622462 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117143771182 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057309053321 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not, global tourism has increased so much o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds international tourism be changed.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42086330935 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9492279059 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7159999589 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188275474216 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602045729779 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683207622462 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117143771182 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057309053321 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.