In the modern world, the image (photograph or film) is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The means of communication has been drawing a great deal of public attention. The question of whether the digital device or the written word have a more marked influence on the measure of communication is a controversial issue. I totally agree with this point of view.
There are several reasons to explain why availing the cutting-edge devices, particularly photograph or film could reap an array of benefits. Firstly, in a digital age, the speed and convenience are an integral part of communicating with other people. To be more specific, all citizens exclusively bring laptop and phone with them, which could support them to boast exchange pleasantries such as work, ordinary conversations immediately without waiting for the response for a longer duration. More importantly, employing state-of-the-art technology is to cate to people having a high rate of accuracy in typing texts by virtue of being installed applications to going their over mistakes instantly. As a result, this means that this can minimize the larger likelihood of causing their wrongdoings to those people sent.
On the contrary, many hold a belief that the use of the written word could exert an adverse impact on our life and their increasing popularity. One major disincentive of using the written word is the cost. Competing with freely available images, the paper producers are facing the risks of falling circulation figures. From environment perspectives, the utilization of paper to write, which takes its toll on many onerous problems in the environment. The reason is that residents are likely to throw their paper impulsively which pushes the amount of paper to the brink of exhaust, especially it also the main culprit dropping considerably the number of green trees by cutting trees and deforestations with the sole objective to enhance the quality of people. Although this complicated problem is not able to suffer from pressing pressures at present but in the future, this malady could be gained around by the environmental argument.
For the reasons mentioned above, I wholly believe that the advantages of employing break devices would be better in lieu of using the tradition method, particularly written word.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | nguyenne | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | Nadish | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
- In the modern world the image photograph or film is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 78
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...awing a great deal of public attention. The question of whether the digital device or the written word ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
... those people sent. On the contrary, many hold a belief that the use of the written wo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29545454545 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00992139563 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616477272727 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9230403772 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10862547368 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391765739695 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395001117975 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750562622884 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416643316365 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.