In the modern world, the image (photograph or film) is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
As technology progresses, the type of communication is derived from letters into email such as photographs, film, and images, which is ubiquitous in the daily routine. From my perspective, I strongly agree that this verbal contact is more expressive and dominant compared with written letters.
In the past, the majority of people infused emotions in activities such as writing diaries and putting their feeling and opinions on a piece of paper, while in this modern lifestyle as well as the technology development, it has become fashionably late whereas the appearance of digital devices. Moreover, just by through the letters, which is complex for the writer to illustrate specifically for the receiver to conjure up the message such as sceneries and the priceless moments. Evidence for this is provided by the demonstrating of explorers about their trip and the spectacular views and picturesque places just by a letter, which is less specific than an image that they can figure out considerably.
In addition, there is no doubt that the image has a powerful impact on the conservation between people today. Moreover, the convenience and advancement of technology make it available to take a shot rapidly and save cheerful moments in a qualified picture or video that enhances the longevity of memories. Nevertheless, this reduces the time to get messages across, which is uncomplicated to maneuver as well as the reasonable price and the wide variety of choices in terms of size, color, and standard. For example, there is impossible to figure out the excitement of a football match through a letter and the illustration of the spectator, while a video is worth more than myriad words about the movement of players during the match.
To sum up, the picture plays an essential role in the daily life of people in order to convey information as quickly as possible to the surrounding situations in a realistic way prefer than the old type of message.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | nguyenne | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | Nadish | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-01 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
- Increasing numbers of students are choosing to study abroad To what extent does this trend benefit the students themselves and the countries involved What are the drawbacks 92
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Some people say that advertising has a positive impact on our lives Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 78
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight 87
- In the modern world the image photograph or film is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a realistic way" with adverb for "realistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... possible to the surrounding situations in a realistic way prefer than the old type of message. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08074534161 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96092239952 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4142836902 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.6 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129080270002 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453555090049 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334470198252 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712309255308 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245752582383 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.