ome people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that units such as chemistry, physics and other subjects involving theoretical concepts should be taught, whilst some think that wide skill-setting modules like cookery and engineering would be more advantageous. This essay completely agrees that education based on topics should be encouraged. This essay would discuss both views of the argument.
On the one hand, studying academically would enhance the brain span of solving complex problems. Additionally, issues plagued with the world and beyond would have solutions with relation to theory. It is therefore agreed that these conceptual modules allow us to figure out answers to our day-to-day activities. For example, electricians who work for large successful companies have enhanced knowledge in the field of electronics. The basic fact of how current passes through circuits, their direction, the component types allow them to think practically on complex problems with the help of the simple task procedures learnt in school.
On the other hand, practical learning gives you an understanding of the daily challenges and quick responses towards them. Furthermore, with the practice of carrying out tasks, your brain would automatically adopt and retain these actions. However, academic subjects would give the same result on a step by step process. For instance, the development of medication involves testing new procedures and carrying out experiments. This is based on the assumed knowledge of scientists knowing how different chemicals react and what the product would be as a result.
In conclusion, the point that learning the complex subjects would give the same outcome as handling the practical situation should be clear with relation to solving logical problems and co-addressing the scenarios based on the outline learnt.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58483754513 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88719751657 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610108303249 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2201530795 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157582978248 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504410633817 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535784540427 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101536140126 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679457006587 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.