Q19. Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the question of how to support less-developed countries has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that financial help should take precedence over practical assistance and advice, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that third world countries can benefit a great deal from receiving financial support do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that an astronomical amount of money is required to construct a high quality of infrastructure, including railways and roads, which makes it possible for developing countries to invigorate economic growth. In fact, these nations are not able to build facilities without monetary help from global charities. Furthermore, a multitude of citizens in Africa are suffering from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education as well as balanced meals. If it were not for financial assistance for socially disadvantaged people, they would have difficulty leading a better life.
On the other hand, others contend that more emphasis should be placed on practical help and technical advice than monetary support. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that although it seems beneficial for global charitable foundations to provide poorer countries with vast sums of money in the short term, developed countries having invaluable skills and experiences derived from trial and error should teach these to emerging countries. This is because obtaining these skills and experiences enables third world countries not only to stimulate economic and political progress but also to become less dependent on other nations in the long term. In addition, the majority of less-developed countries are experiencing high levels of corruption preventing the masses from having an improved standard of living. If experts from global institutions give numerous pieces of useful advice, this phenomenon would be alleviated.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q11 Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say that we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both sides a 89
- Q11 Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both views and gi 84
- X 89
- Q 14 Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 589, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education as well as b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 925, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, this phenomenon would be alleviated. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, third, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48767123288 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89842296693 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613698630137 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6959745293 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.1875 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176186642631 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544503073634 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447452562662 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101960640875 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067127972845 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.