In some countries, people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it a positive or negative development
Laboring efficiently is the most quintessential activity which requires from employees. However, people spend long hours at work in some countries, and this essay will look into the positive and negative sites of this procedure in the following paragraphs with appropriate examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that working long hours is detrimental to the health of the inhabitants. Mainly because when a person works for an extended time, the brain which is one of the most essential parts of the human will exhaust. As a result of this consequence, the productivity of work will decrease, and this will affect not only the employees but also the golden future of any company or organization. For instance, the statistics illustrate that people can work until 16 hours, but if they labor without breaks, this will lead to unpleasant circumstances. Therefore, if the government reduces the number of employment hours in some nations, it brings a plethora of profits to the city.
On the other hand, it is an indisputable fact that there are other positive sites for employing a lengthy time. For example, if someone who wants to cross the goal line works a long time on his or herself, this will bear fruit in the upcoming future and as a result, he/she can achieve success with the help of his/her curiosity and labor. Nevertheless, there are such kinds of professions that require working a long period such as doctors. Furthermore, even the authorities cannot modify this system because of the prosperous future of the population.
In conclusion, it is evident that there are positive and negative sites of employing long hours, but the health of the citizens is extremely dominant rather than everything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 87
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this case What can be done to attract more local people 84
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 91
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0553633218 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88514509373 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9394654569 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285419818568 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973690565007 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907771404668 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179047263089 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815440501202 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.