In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? And is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that today, people tend to spend more time devoting to work. Reasons for this vary, and I believe that the trend has both negative and positive effects in equal measure.
The reason for an increase in working hours is largely down to a high living standard. With the development of the economy, it is undeniable that there is a considerable rise in prices. Everything ranging from basic necessities such as food and clothing to modern equipment like computers and televisions tends to be more expensive than in the past. Therefore, workers are under increasing pressure to try their best to work longer hours to satisfy their need in daily life.
I believe that this trend has both advantages and disadvantages. The benefit is that employers can hone their working skills by spending more time at work. Each job requires different qualifications and skills, and working more helps workers attain proficiency in accomplishing the task. Take a businessman as an example. The more he works, the more able in business matters he is. As a result, people being highly experienced and skilled have more likelihood of being promoted, climbing higher in the company’s hierarchy.
However, the drawback of spending more time at work is that this tendency can inform workers’ health negatively. Working long hours tends to be the culprit of a colossal number of health problems such as stress, sleep deprivation and headache. Recent study shows that in 2017, more than a half of the population suffered from lack of sleep, resulting from being at work for long hours. Moreover, working more means that people tend to spend less time with their family or friends. This is evident in most cities in China, where common working hours of workers go from 7 a.m to about 9 p.m. As a result, there is scarcity of time bonding with their relatives or friends. This gradually leads to a gap in relationship with their beloved ones.
In conclusion, spending long hours at work resulting from a high living standard has both negative and positive influences on workers. They should therefore have a good work-life balance to deprive of disadvantageous impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | phuonganhnguien | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | phuonganhnguien | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- In most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Topic In most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Although more and more people read news on the internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...rise in prices. Everything ranging from basic necessities such as food and clothing to modern equ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74960715488 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2887382463 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27183628945 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867036853814 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696802081441 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171875502839 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603821265625 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.