Some people believe that anyone can create art such as painting, poetry, music and so on. Others think that a person should have special abilities to create art. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary society, art has gained more attention compared to the past, leading to many opposing viewpoints related to this issue. While many people consider that people can freely create artistic items including paintings, poetry or music, the others believe that this type of work is only suitable to people possessing aptitudes in art. Personally, although the second viewpoint seems judicious in some aspects, I’m of the opinion that everyone has the right to design their personal items.
On the other hand, I understand why many people of the fervent conviction argue that only gifted people such as artists or authors can successfully create artistic masterpieces. To begin with, advanced knowledge is necessary in term of creating artworks. For example, visual arts require artists to possess in-depth knowledge in other areas including painting, sculpture. Hence, this task is extremely demanding for a normal individual. Moreover, a number of special skills are also worth-mentioning. For instance, people making clay not only have to obtain creativity but also need to be well-educated in design field. Consequently, it is widely believed that only specialists can fulfill that set of skills in an effective way.
Despite the reasons described above, I still believe that normal humans can freely represent their imagination in art. First of all, since art is just the creation in life, anything people come up with can naturally become artworks. Additionally, while many kids start to create their personal songs and publish on youtube, some adults also write poets to express emotions or attractive ideas. Hence, it is really difficult to prevent normal people from creating art-related products. Moreover, the conventional viewpoint which considers that art is an inherent trait is solely erroneous. In addition, the more the people allocate time to practice drawing, the more beautiful the results will become. Hence, it might be really erroneous if people prohibit everyone from enhancing their abilities.
Taking everything into consideration, although experts may contribute to many benefits related to artworks, I still believe that all people have the right to experience and enhance in this field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | lasssssddd | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | quynhnhi280103 | 95 | view |
| 2020-10-06 | Shivangip | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-13 | hrbhalala | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-30 | Zahra5604 | 88 | view |
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 78
- 30 In many countries art galleries visitors have been declining steadily What are the possible reasons How to change this trend 92
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalilites and areas 78
- Newspaper have an enormous influence on people s views Why is that Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that a negative and positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e has the right to design their personal items. On the other hand, I understand ...
^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cialists can fulfill that set of skills in an effective way. Despite the reasons described above, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the right to experience and enhance in this field.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49275362319 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82414054117 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591304347826 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9266130326 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.277777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7222222222 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282429608585 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803091523247 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588281440506 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164156813916 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06254369832 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.