Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful. Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
When it comes to defining success, each people will have their own notions that is nowhere the same as others’. A number of individuals endow triumph with an excessive amount of fortune. Whereas, others opine that those who devote their life to society like scientists and teachers are more successful. From my own perspectives, one’s worldly influence should be held in higher esteem.
On the one hand, obviously enough, possessing millions of dollar conduces to living life to the fullest. A billionaire can fulfill their crazily extravagant habit, pursue their most insane dreams without taking wherewithal into consideration or even participate in one-of-a-kind experiences such as taking a journey to space. Moreover, our prior generations had endured a long period of indulgence. Therefore, it stands to reason that success to them is no longer suffer from starvation or observing luxurious objects that only the affluent can afford with alacrity, which can be put in word of one syllable as “rich”.
On the other hand, money manifests itself as a mean to satisfy physical desire rather than emotional and moral counterparts. People who work in scientific or social field are recorded to derive more delectation and sense of meaningfulness from their achievements compared with those in upper stratum. Additionally, their hypothesis and studies are significantly beneficial to every human being in the entire globe. To illustrate, renowned, erudite scientists in biology are not wealthy but worldwide respected with regard to their dauntless endeavor to find the permanent treatment to once terminal diseases. This fact can also be extended to other profession that involve determination, creativity and devotion.
In conclusion, I think both sides both have their sounding reason to corroborate their point of view. Nonetheless, in terms of triumph, contribution to the sake of the society should be held in higher place in ladder of success than money. Money should constitute a mean to a better end, not the top of the list criteria for success.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 56 | view |
2022-03-07 | iambest | 73 | view |
2022-01-26 | sonnn | 78 | view |
2021-12-28 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 78 | view |
2021-11-22 | minhminhvu7 | 80 | view |
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
- the diagram below gives the information about the Hawaiian island chains in the center of the Pacific ocean write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown 61
- Some people think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires talent and ability Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- Some people argue holding sporting events is beneficial to a country s development Other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
When it comes to defining success, each ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uence should be held in higher esteem. On the one hand, obviously enough, posse...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut in word of one syllable as “rich”. On the other hand, money manifests itsel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, i think, in conclusion, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36307692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99680303029 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2896658901 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224575501953 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656974059102 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712544712885 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139038544936 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829685709965 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.