Some say that because many people are living much longer than, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably.
According to a recent study by Cambridge University, average life expectancy of people increased to 20 years longer. Some claim that pension age should be raised because many people are living much longer than ever before. In my personal opinion, I completely agree with the former assertion. This essay will first demonstrate that raising retirement age will reduce the tax burden, then followed by an analysis of how this is beneficial to the economy.
There is an argument of the justification, which can demonstrate the statement to wit; this can reduce the tax burden on the authority and taxpayers. This borne by the fact that nowadays, it is extremely expensive for the government to support this group of people because the pension was designed to maintain people for a much shorter time. The hardship, therefore, not only falls on the authority because they will receive less tax in relation to the size of the population, but also taxpayers from business of all sizes to young commuters, who end up working harder to pay for the extended retirement of the old. The Times recently reported that each retirement person in Japan could receive up to 5000 dollars.
Apart from the practical concern expressed above, it is also conceded that claim is rich in merit because from an economic prospective, allowing people to work longer is extremely beneficial. The rationale behind this is that many 65 and 70 employees are healthy enough to continue a productive working life and the experience they have is needed to many companies. Thus, the longer they can work, the more they can devote to their fields and promoting the value of hard working attitude among young commuters. According to the PEW Center, 65% of pension workers claimed that they are not ready to retire and believe that this is actually their prime time.
Subsequently, weighing all the aforementioned, it can now be safely stated that the age to retire should be increased to adapt to the life expectancy of people in the contemporary word and that this could reduce tax burden and boost the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 70 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | rumpul4skin | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | rumpul4skin | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 92
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 56
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ing much longer than ever before. In my personal opinion, I completely agree with the former ass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95988538682 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.683181824 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530085959885 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.288806019 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337875515347 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116778089465 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13406765227 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205353644377 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786204164979 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.