Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Accommodations as basic assistance should be given to more evacuees by wealthy nations. In the name of human rights and solidarity among member of the United Nations are the primary reasons for wealthy nations for doing this step in the middle of the refugee crisis.

The human has rights for life since they born therefore anyone including evacuee have to get protection and service. Giving and getting right for life to anyone are same with humanity action, as the basic of humanity does not know about tribe or race. Many countries since decades ago like France had accepted thousands of people as evacuees of war in the African continent. And nowadays, the evacuees have given positive impact and even several of the refugees have made France famous in the world such as Paul Pogba and Zidane who had won the world cup in 1998 and 2018 respectively.

Humanity action to the evacuee is the solidarity of the United Nations. One of the goals of United Nations is each nations have to help the nations that experience crisis. In 2010, thousands of refugees from Suriah and Palestine was accepted in Turkey and Iran, this phenomenon made the chief of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon voiced out to the other countries, especially developed nations such as the USA and the other countries of Europe to receive the refugees. After the action of the United Nations, the number of refugees experienced significantly decreasing in 2011.

In conclusion, human rights are the essential thing for everyone, every need have to be get likewise the evacuee. Therefore, in the name of human rights, all countries have to be solidarity to solve the crisis of refugees.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-10 Nyasha 61 view
2021-09-03 Renu_art 61 view
2021-02-27 anoj adhikari 33 view
2020-10-11 Lien Huynh 78 view
2020-06-12 NeutronnzZ 78 view
Essays by user Afdalah Harris :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'includes'.
Suggestion: includes
...r life since they born therefore anyone including evacuee have to get protection and serv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ng and getting right for life to anyone are same with humanity action, as the basic...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5559454499 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7847992572 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127879366819 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507064583954 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586773616626 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831285185098 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583976473572 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.