Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is not essential to spend money on the protection of wild animals because humans don’t need them. However, I firmly disagree with this point of view and this essay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow.
To begin with, in my opinion, it is senseless to argue that animals have no place in the 21st century. The animal now still plays an imperative role in the balance of nature and supply us with many important products and always be preserved because of its uses. Without the animal, the planet Earth turns into a humans-and-plants planet that is less diverse and tedious. Furthermore, there is no adequate reason to eradicate animals. There is plenty of room, spaces for people to exist side by side with animals, instead of destroying every last square meter of land to feed or accommodate the world’s population.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of the wild, most scientists admit that these habitats play a vital role in humans’ life. For example, rainforests which are the home to a multitude of animals, produce a large number of oxygens absorb carbon dioxide, and stabilize the Earth’s climate. If we wiped out these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. The more you spend on the protection of animals, the safer condition they will get and with their uses, you can gain a lot because animals supply people with many products such as food, fur, medicine, …
The message is conveyed therefore protecting wild animals, in another word, is protecting our planet and our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- In some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Environmental degradation is a major world problem What causes this problem and what can we do to prevent it 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ay will discuss the reasons for my view as follow. To begin with, in my opinion, it is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...home to a multitude of animals, produce a large number of oxygens absorb carbon dioxide, and stab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89455782313 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61517736834 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5979015827 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191853395363 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722371593745 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793395076252 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111127700204 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171619765522 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.