Medical services should be run by profit-making company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is obvious that the development of technologies and economic has advanced the field of medical services. Some argue that people should receive health services from profit-making companies. Personally speaking, although for-profit medical companies may provide better quality services, it brings no benefit for justice in society if profits rule in the field of healthcare.
Healthcare provided by profit-making companies is renowned for its reputation in high-quality services and advanced equipment. With more capital and budget, business-driven medical organizations can invest more in the medical tools and upgrading their technology system, resulting in decent and efficient quality of services. Under this circumstance, clients are able to receive top medical practices from the finest medical professionals, which leads to a higher satisfaction rate for profit-making agencies and better medical care of the public.
However, racial and income disparities in society may prevent low-income families from receiving medical support from for-profit companies. With the increasing number of the for-profit medical organizations, it would inevitably decrease the availability of health care for marginalized populations as their priority is earning profits than taking care of people in need. For instance, a homeless person who has limited budget will be turned away from receiving medical services due to lack of insurance, which may worsen their current situation by not receiving medical cares from the agencies that require insurance.
Furthermore, society has the obligation to support everyone’s basic needs rather than rely on aid from profit-making companies. While profit-making companies gain high revenue and cutting-edge technology to support their services, they put the burden of those “unprofitable” patients to non-profit organizations and public hospitals. Under this circumstance, the government should support low-income families in the community by supporting local organizations to build quality medical clinics under more economical budgets.
In conclusion, although profit-making companies would provide advanced medical services, it could bring harm to certain populations and cause more problems. A structured society ought to stimulate non-profit organizations in providing low-cost medical services to reduce inequality in medical services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- There is a problem with the changing rooms in the sports centre that you visit You have complained several times but with no success Write a letter to the manager of the sports centre In your letter Describe what the problem with the changing room is Say 81
- There is a problem with the changing rooms in the sports centre that you visit You have complained several times but with no success Write a letter to the manager of the sports centre In your letter Describe what the problem with the changing rooms is Say 81
- Medical services should be run by profit making company To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clinics under more economical budgets. In conclusion, although profit-making co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17417417417 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25870798574 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537537537538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6019314477 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.857142857 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247671437238 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107689146653 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448705526034 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167832831249 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334809433331 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.