More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.
Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years the companies policies are gearing towards working from home over the alternative to traditional office-based employment.
In my opinion, this style of working brings more benefits than drawbacks for both the employees and employers.
Considering firstly advantages of this style of working, an imperative one is that it is more time-efficient. This is because it reduces the travelling time of the employees'. To illustrate, as per a report published in 2019, usually, an employee spent around 20 percent of his time in commuting to and fro from the office. Hence, as a result of enabling this practice, they are freed up with more time for performing other useful activities. Another crucial advantage of this approach is that it is more cost-efficient for the employers. The reason for this is that most of the employees will visit the office occasionally. This will help employers in saving cost on the required infrastructure such as office space as now they can be shared by many employees. To illustrate, reports have shown that many companies profit has increased after enabling policies work as a result of the relaxed environment and saving on infrastructure by introducing an open floor in spite of named office concept.
However, this way of working does bring problems. One of the common problems is that it acts as a deterrent for employees' health. This is because usually houses are not equipped with proper infrastructure required for working. For example, a person who has to work on computers for long hours need a proper desk and chair for avoiding injuries in their spinal cord. Nevertheless, these ill health effects can be avoided by taking proper cautiousness.
In conclusion, although working from home is more employee time-efficient and cost-friendly for the employers, can bring some ill-effects on the health which can be avoided by taking proper rest and cautiousness. Hence, In my opinion, remote working is more advantageous for both employees and employers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-14 | amat_96 | 87 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | Eslam Mobarak | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | Sumitkoch85 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-07 | Sumitkoch85 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | Sumitkoch85 | 78 | view |
- Education from preschool through university should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 73
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 73
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Education from preschool through university should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 948, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saving on infrastructure by introducing an open floor in spite of named office c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, nevertheless, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26234567901 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08069067043 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521604938272 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1262751886 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283337035889 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099653041894 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062622893488 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174583418032 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559564304497 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.