Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Experts predict that artificial intelligence will soon surpass human intellect, which has led many to question whether this development is positive or negative. Despite tangible benefits, I believe this development is detrimental in the aggregate due to the inherent risk of a catastrophic robot uprising
Those who endorse AI technology argue that this progress towards automation could unlock infinite potential while posing minimal risks. The most salient example of this is the implementation of AI technology in revolutionary driverless vehicles. Compared to humans, who are prone to perceptual errors, supercomputers can analyze potential hazards through an array of sensors and satellites to maneuver and decide the fastest and safest possible track. In addition, this apocalyptic dystopia is theoretically impossible in the short term, and preventative measures taken now could ensure future machines remain under human control. Nevertheless, this statement is questionable because if machines were indeed more intelligent than humans, they would naturally resist attempts to shut them down, thus rendering human intervention useless.
Therefore, I believe that the proliferation of AI technology is an overall negative due to its intrinsic existential threats. The distinctively superior mental capacity allows humans to exert dominance over other species and have the ability to dictate the other of the natural food web. Other organisms and their survival. On the other hand, depend solely on human goodwill. As a result, if superintelligence were to outsmart the human brain, it would become the new alpha species and attempt to seize power from humans, potentially resulting in an all-out cybernetic revolt and the extinction of humanity. In cases where humans triumphed. It would still take decades to undo the damage left behind, and civilization would at the best remain stagnant.
In conclusion, the prospects of technological breakthroughs fail to take into account the possibility of an AI apocalypse. In my opinion, the government should carefully scrutinize the development of AI technology and create a detailed protocol for the worst-case scenario.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-03 | Nguyễn Thị Phương Huỳnh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nguyễn Thị Phương Huỳnh | 89 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 80
- You recently encountered some problems with public transportation service in your area Write a letter to the manager of the public transport company and say What were the problems Explain how these problems affect the public Suggest what changes could be 11
- Some scientists believe that studying the behavior of 3 year old children can predict their criminality To what extent do you think a crime is a product of human nature or is it possible to stop children from growing up to criminals 84
- You bought a TV a week ago but when you got home you discovered it did not work properly You called customer service to report the problem but you have not yet received any help Write a letter to the company and in your letter Introduce yourself Explain t
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mple of this is the implementation of AI technology in revolutionary driverless v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71913580247 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16849362503 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657407407407 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9961029495 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.533333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150127332944 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476902353439 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375250732071 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846101120723 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038997464605 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.