Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake right away -Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then .
It is a well-known fact that social values are highly dependent on the society that we live. Although initially, it may seem simple, with controversy exists over the topic, writing about this complex is not very convenient because in which multifarious criteria come together as affecting agents. While some allegate the first or third option as an appropriate behavior, but I agree with the second one. To illustrate my perspective of the subject, I will vindicate two reasons in the following article elaborately.
Worthy of mentioning, the first dimension is the values of a communtiy. Depite having different sources and cores, it is an indisputable fact most of them share similar traits. The interupting is considered as an example of annoying behavior in almost every society. In addressing causation and pros and cons of the topic, a vast number of researches have been done conprehensively. The results demonstrate that over 87 percent of the people around the world, with diverse cultures and various nationalities, have the same idea about this approach. So, it can be inferred that if you wanted to be polite, you would not interupt others during their speach.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another point meticulously is the public view. It is inevitability undeniable that no one likes to be ashamed infront of other people because we think our credibility ceaselessly and profoundly affected by their point of view. As you ask a question or correct a mistake, the lecturer might get stressed and forget about he rest of the speach or the debate goes on and diverts from the main topic. What's more, a very tangible example by means of which it can exemplify this aspect is almost in all speaches and presentations, the lectureres and professors prefer to answer the question afterward in a more private locations. So, asking question in private, not only does it come with more better results, but also you can get more sophisticated answers.
In a world, by considering the coincidence of the two presented reasons with referable facts, we may draw the conclusion that the second option outcomes are more commendably lucid. Although the effect amplitude of the suject varies from minor to major spectrum, more aptly-surveyed investigations are required to determine the other involving factors.
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 83
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 3
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 86
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'rests'.
Suggestion: rests
... might get stressed and forget about he rest of the speach or the debate goes on and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...oes on and diverts from the main topic. Whats more, a very tangible example by means ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... in private, not only does it come with more better results, but also you can get more soph...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, well, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14805194805 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94726117891 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592207792208 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.222927403 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.588235294 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.036652590038 0.236089414692 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0107130517792 0.076458572812 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0160151149589 0.0737576698707 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0200346030107 0.150856017488 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124939773151 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.