It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject.
There is a common argument in academics weather broad knowledge or specific subject is better. In my opinion, it is better for students to have both considering the competitive working environment nowadays. Both broad and specific knowledge has huge benefits to students and they have a positive influence on each other. What is more important, from my perspective, it is that students know how to utilise the knowledge and skills learning from school.
There is no doubt that it is beneficial for students to gain as much knowledge as possible whether it is broad or specify. with broad knowledge, students are able to know how the world works and tend to be more curious. With the knowledge of a specific subject, students have a deep understanding so that they can contribute to their work. Besides, both have a positive influence on each other. They help students to learn knowledge better.
Perhaps even more importantly, after gaining the knowledge from school, they should have the ability to use those in real life. If students learn knowledge but don’t know how to use it. Then it is just surface leaning rather than understanding. A technology company, like Apply, become outstanding is not only because of the advanced technology used in their products, but also the fantastic design. It is the combination of knowledge in different areas but also requires a deep understanding in each subject, which makes their product unique and occupying a favourable position in the marketplace. So, utilizing the knowledge to make a benefit is important from my perspective.
Overall, it is better for students to have both broad and specific knowledge considering the competitive world. More importantly, it is the ability to utilise the knowledge to make a difference.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject. 60
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject. 60
- the extended family is now less important than it was in the past. 70
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ossible whether it is broad or specify. with broad knowledge, students are able to k...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, then, no doubt, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 290.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16206896552 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96255064126 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9221566554 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0588235294 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300284766359 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11421099593 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118508481523 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221490291767 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722508286217 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.