TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that todays' world complexity in the social and political conditions pose that teacher get eager to make their views in the aftermentioned areas known to students. This brings up an arguable question regarding to whether it is permitted to teachers express their point of view concerning with political and social or not. Some individuals reject this stance whereas others buttress. As far as I'm concerned, I feel that the idea of making political and social view known to students in classroom must be prohibited. The reason behind this standpoint are discuss in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, by stating political view to students, teachers will affect on the students viewpoint on politics, which create some problems in the school. In fact, each adult has a specific point of view to various things. Some juveniles oppose to the politicians in their country, whereas others support them. If a teacher describe his or her view to the student in the school, it will lead on that adults have conflict in their mind and miss their ideas and thought about politics in their country. They may oppose to the view that agreed with them before, or they may support them. Moreover, adults are in the sensitive ages and teachers by discussing their perspective at school will lead onto the increasing hostility amount their classmates. For instance, consider a teacher in the school who thinks that his countries president is not a good politician. When the students who have the same perspective as the teacher observe it, they force other students to accept and agree with the students who do not believe in that opinion. Consequently, they start to struggle with one another, which will create a sense of hatred among their classmate which in turn, influence on the students 'relationship with each other.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that educator' and teachers' job are only to educate people. Indeed, people send their children to the school and university in order to broaden children' knowledge. Teachers at school should merely give information related to class material and their textbooks, rather than elaborating on social or political views. Furthermore, students do not need any knowledge from their teacher in the political and social areas, because young people are able to represent their ideas particular places such as in social and political campaign in which their freely exchange idea with other people. However, school time only should be allocated to academic matter such as reading academic textbooks and reviewing journal papers which all of these tasks and activities are responsibility of teachers. Hence, education and teaching are only thing that are of paramount importance for future generation and teachers and educators should concentrate on them in the classroom.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factors, I would contend that teachers should not be allowed to express their political and social standpoint to the students, because they impact on juveniles, causing issues in the school and they are just accountable for educating children.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which do you agree with? 73
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? 90
- In future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying traditional schools Which would you prefer Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice 89
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ance whereas others buttress. As far as Im concerned, I feel that the idea of maki...
^^
Line 1, column 571, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
.... The reason behind this standpoint are discuss in the following paragraphs. To begin...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...litical view to students, teachers will affect on the students viewpoint on politics, whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...o students, teachers will affect on the students viewpoint on politics, which create som...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...assmate which in turn, influence on the students relationship with each other. The seco...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2639.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22574257426 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73508574813 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50297029703 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5589610493 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0476190476 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32520804522 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982100589355 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545888909161 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19410402298 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640811341343 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.