At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays in many countries number of adolescent has increased in comparison with older generation. According to surveys there could be more advantages regarding this issue that outweigh disadvantages. Two main reasons to support this idea are the number of young people who can look after old people; also, the role that young people can have in society is more obvious than old generation.
The first challenge is that in some countries like China the number of older people are more than youngsters, something about one young adult in contrast with 2 old people because of the rule people could not have more one child. Therefore, there are not enough adolescents to take care of older generation. Other examples are Austria, Netherlands and Germany who decide to accept migrants from all over the world to grow their population. As a result, countries with enough young adults are more likely to be in peace more than others such as India that 60% of its population is young adults.
The other factor in favor of this issue is that old people and youngsters are not having the same role in social activities. We cannot deny the fact that old people have a crucial role in youth’s life; but, young adults’ ability is more obvious in many cases such as grubbing, plumbing and labor works; so, it is beneficial to have more adolescents in a society. In some developing countries like Australia and India the number of teenagers are so high and it provoke the government to supply more jobs and opportunity for them; as a consequence, the country’s progress is more obvious.
In conclusion, as mentioned above the benefits of having many adolescents to compare with older generation outweigh the drawbacks. Therefore, it assist the society to improve more.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
2019-12-04 | Lucre96 | 67 | view |
2019-11-14 | Lauriel | 61 | view |
2019-11-07 | green1222 | 89 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. to what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- the chart below gives information about Soutland's main exports in 2000, 20.., and future projections for 2025. 67
- car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam.how true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays in many countries number of ado...
^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provokes'?
Suggestion: provokes
... number of teenagers are so high and it provoke the government to supply more jobs and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...n outweigh the drawbacks. Therefore, it assist the society to improve more.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75324365447 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510135135135 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.355974082 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207328722921 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836835002003 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610782324442 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139938092167 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541281659421 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.