Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of correcting mistake a by teacher or a meeting leader engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that our teacher wrong opinion about something should be interrupted and corrected or do not mention any thing. However, others may take an opposite view point and believe that it is more beneficial in correcting his mistake after the meeting. As far as I am concerned, it is better to wait until the meeting or class is over and then talk to our teacher or meeting leader and correct him.
The first reason worth mentioning is that it is not good for our meeting leader's spirit to point out his mistakes in front of other people and it is possible our employer lose his confident and also it might has negative effects on his self-esteem. For instance, when me and my friend working in a company, we had a meeting about or research and in meeting our manager make a wrong decision and my friend interrupt him and correct him and after one week our manager did not com e to company and he was shamed because of his fatal and he never attend another meeting because he lost his confident to talk in front of other people. Moreover, when you say your boss's mistake and interrupt him, your boss look at you in a different way. For example, a person who work in a big company, when he interrupt his boss's speak and correct whose mistake right away, it may make your boss angry and after this time he is going to treat you in a different way or even fire you.
A further more subtle to point out is that it is a chance that you misunderstand your manager opinion and it is better to wait and talk to him after meeting. For instance, my friend always talk about his experiences in one meeting which he anticipated. He assert that her meeting leader says something wrong in a meeting and after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose manager's opinion and it has negative influence on my friend because his colleague think he did not focus on their manager speak. Moreover, correct your manager's mistake after meeting are helping you to building a better friend ship with your manager since you gave him a chance to correct his mistake in another meeting and this helps employees when they make mistake they have a chance to correct themselves.
To make a long story short, based on aforementioned argument, it is more advantage to correct your manager after meeting. Consequently, it is highly recommended that other employees to do not interrupt their boss during his speech and think about their action because it has a momentous effects on their future.
- TPO 32 80
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- “Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.” 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...rrupted and corrected or do not mention any thing. However, others may take an opposite v...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attends'.
Suggestion: attends
...hamed because of his fatal and he never attend another meeting because he lost his con...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nd interrupt him, your boss look at you in a different way. For example, a person who work in a bi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interrupts'.
Suggestion: interrupts
...rson who work in a big company, when he interrupt his bosss speak and correct whose mista...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 927, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...fter this time he is going to treat you in a different way or even fire you. A further more subtl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...in one meeting which he anticipated. He assert that her meeting leader says something ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... meeting and after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose managers opi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'misunderstands'.
Suggestion: misunderstands
... after interrupting him, he find out he misunderstand whose managers opinion and it has negat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...their action because it has a momentous effects on their future.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65531914894 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57174112653 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427659574468 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1769317194 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.285714286 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 20.6045352989 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330346817588 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133921383837 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634651301105 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213314644608 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942699522199 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.