In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of parents' role in juvenile's life engendered copious controversies among people. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that young people can make a better decision about their lives today. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that young people depended too much on their parents today. As far as I am concerned, young people like student are not depended on their parents and there is more beneficial for them to make their own decision. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that parents have more knowledge today. Nowadays, the development of the technology happening at a very fast pace which led to many facilities for people to become educated. This advancement changes people's lives and helping juvenile to make their own decision. For example, when a person wants to chose her future job, he can use information on the internet or even buy a book about job and read it and this gives him a great perspective about all jobs. Hence, he do not need his parents guidance and are independence. Moreover, parents in the past, it was a tradition which forced children to pursue their parents' job and this takes their right to make their own decision.
The second significant reason supporting my idea is that the number of offspring was higher in the past. Families in societies in the past have many children and they really depended on each other. For instance, my father has four brothers and three sisters and all of them grow up together and in arduous lives, in the past, they always depended on each other. But parents prefer to have just one child today. Therefore, this child from its school time learns how to make his decision by himself. Also, children have many friends this day and their friend has a crucial effect on their life. For example, a person who is the only offspring of a family should make friend because he does not have a brother or sister and whose parents are busy all the time. Furthermore, he finds a friend and grows up with them and they make their own decision and this helps them to become successful in the future.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned argument, parents have not involved in their young people today and young people make their own decision. Consequently, it is highly recommended that let juvenile make their own path because it is necessary for them in hectic life and this task helps them to overcome problems. There is a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | nusybah | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | 3dra | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | naziii | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 65
- old friends vs new friends 60
- tpo 33 75
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 60
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...t perspective about all jobs. Hence, he do not need his parents guidance and are i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80686695279 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54665613288 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504291845494 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3941068136 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545568435689 0.236089414692 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151784702713 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146015088296 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359514260764 0.150856017488 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123658125898 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.