The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the ability to become master in more than one language will be less important in future. This essay disagree with this statement and belives that becoming bilingual or trilingual will be more important in coming future. This essay will first discuss the potential positive impact along with supporting arguments.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons why we should learn more than one language. But the most notable one stems from the fact that one can communicate without any hesitation. It will help to adopt international or forigen country's culture. Moreover, it may give more career scope in future. For example, learning English language for non-native English speaking country will open international market for individual.
Some may offer a contrary argument that learning other than mother tounge language is no use. However, it also needs to be taken into consideration that learning a new language needs hard working to become master in that. The most concerning aspect about this fact is individual may not get a healthy environment in their native country. For example, in Mexico maximum population used to speak in Spanish language and there are very few English institutions.
Taking into account the arguments discussed, we can conclude that learning more than one language will be compulsary for individual to get success in their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Any new technological development in recent times is a boon or curse for society in general. Doyou agree or disagree that mass media like TV, radio and newspapers have a huge impact onpeople, especially the young generation. 80
- Television Good or Bad 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...han one language will be less important in future. This essay disagree with this statemen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...Moreover, it may give more career scope in future. For example, learning English language...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'offers'.
Suggestion: offers
...onal market for individual. Some may offer a contrary argument that learning other...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...a contrary argument that learning other than mother tounge language is no use. Howev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27149321267 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68359745435 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4642410359 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402874093011 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140891547162 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140051097943 0.071462118173 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242867635788 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941738907117 0.0609392437508 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.