It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Recently, the phenomenon of preserving the historical buildings which are expensive to preserve and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of indicating the history of a country is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that monument buildings can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint,conservation of historical buildings which cots highly can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of upholding one's tradition, as well as costume, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered protection one's cultural tradition. Thus, beneficial ramifications of encouraging one's to build beautiful buildings apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, conservation attractive buildings might increase consequences of declining in budget. Moreover, fundamental aspects of making lost could relate to this reality that the demerits of ordinary buildings pertain to lack of budget. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of quite old buildings is correlated negatively with neglecting old and ordinary architecture. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of lack of money.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of conservation stunning building which are extremely expensive outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of preservation of the old building should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Gohar Khan | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Bhawati | 80 | view |
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- In the past 100 years, there are many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important invent for the past 100 years? Why? 85
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , conservation
...ut this essay. From a social standpoint,conservation of historical buildings which cots hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...From a social standpoint,conservation of historical buildings which cots highly ...
^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt,conservation of historical buildings which cots highly can provide the societ...
^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ed in the fact that merits of upholding ones tradition, as well as costume, are inex...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y expensive outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of preservation of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76981132075 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39592451488 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4666952411 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169649717035 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640236867018 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548309152506 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105746767505 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375017261938 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.