Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spent solving immediate problems here on Earth.
Recently, the phenomenon of space exploration and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the aerospace industry might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the developments in space technologies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, investment in space exploration projects can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that doing research on space, as well as the expansion of human knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of space expeditions in broadening human's horizons. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both understanding the universe and searching for other intelligent species apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, pouring money into outer space missions might increase the consequences of inadequate resources for our immediate problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of wasting public funds could relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of economic resources lead to poverty. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of spending a lot of money on creating space shuttles is correlated negatively with obtaining enormous profits for politicians. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of investment in public services.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that allocating adequate budget for space exploration far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of detecting unexplored planets, but also pinpoint more advancement in practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kbalavenka | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 80
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- Essay topics: Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74402730375 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26903312855 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658703071672 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7802189915 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269359705065 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796207810472 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517071134518 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13809366282 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360197993199 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 55.0591133005 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.