Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time jobs and see it as a good thing while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views
Some countries believe in engaging teenagers in work while others oppose to this and opine they need to focus on studies. I concur with the notion that teenagers need to be involved in part time jons along with studies. Both the above opinions would be analysed in detail.
Jobs help develop interpersonal skills amongst teenagers. They need to foster skills that help them keep at an edge in today's competitive world. Jobs can work towards making an individual responsible and inculcate the habit of value for money. They can shoulder financial responsibilities of their families. It will even help them sponsor their studies and pursue towards their intended career path. It even provides them insights about their areas of interest which can help them define their career goals and roadmap towards it.
To the above ideology many oppose as they feel the primary objective of studies can be adversely impacted with jobs in focus. Earning money without being aware of its optimum spending can lead a youth being involved in unethical measures. Youth plays a pivotal role in defining the future growth prospects of any nation. If their lives are not directed in an appropriate manner it can adversely impact a nation's progress in all aspects.
Inculcating values and fostering responsibility at an early age can make a teenager grow as responsible citizen contributing towards his nation's development. However, this needs to be coupled with right mentoring at all levels to keep the adverse consequences at minimal.
- Science tells us about activities which are good for our health and others which are bad. Millions of people all over the world knows this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is and what can be done to change it? 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause 77
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time jobs and see it as a good thing while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 56
- Some people get famous at a young age. Is its a good or a bad thing? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...n that teenagers need to be involved in part time jons along with studies. Both the above...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... future growth prospects of any nation. If their lives are not directed in an appr...
^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nation. If their lives are not directed in an appropriate manner it can adversely impact a nations progr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14979757085 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69585775504 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619433198381 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1966113015 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850380552613 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032882062618 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487750460828 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639141994769 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816773507505 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.