Nowadays families move to different countries to work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent times, the essential involvement of working class parents to structured labour can require the relocation of their families to different countries. While some people think that this change in location presents a decline in the development of the children, that notably need to go along with their parents; however, others believe that there seem to be no drawback to this effect. I believe, though, that there will be adverse consequences that will befall the children of these parents.
The way in which a child reacts to a new environment, characterised by difference in weather, friendships, food and education is vital. For example, a child may be having it going well and seems to have settled in a calm and warm climate; say Nigeria, then when the parent happen to migrate to Canada - a more temperate, cold and arid region - changes are bound to take place with regards to the receptivity of that child. There will be a longer time to adapt to friends, both in school and around the neighbourhood that may, most likely, speak different language and also display diverse attitudes. In school, new curriculum, that may be above the ability of comprehension akin to where they come from, is another hurdle for the need to adjust favourably into the new environment.
On the other hand, the idea and common possibility of the parent having to act as a big contributor to help the child - in particular, if the ward happens to be calm and adventurous - will obviously go a long way in self positive inclusion into the society. Not every young person, for instance, turns a cold face, and forever wishes to be static and adverse to change. Even at that young age, some children love diversity; get excited at the news of moving to a new location. It is good for their social development. They see the need to change friends, experience another culture and learn a foreign language. It is rather to them, a tasty challenge than a moody event.
To conclude, the requirement to be in a workforce and labour to fend for family can serve, nowadays, as an avenue to change residence. Although this may be challenging to the accompanying children, however to some, it may just be the dream change they have been expecting. I believe; therefore, that as a result of this movement, albeit compulsory, the children in question, may have it difficult to settler in into their new environment as the difference to education setting, language, weather, food and lifestyle will definitely constitute more problem than bargained for.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Android | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | bhavesh7890 | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | kalpan.vaghela | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | johnmathewg | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | Mehdi.Babaie | 71 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies, and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree.Discuss both these vi 73
- nowadays more and more people want to live themselves.what are the reasons? is it a positive trend or negative trend. 84
- Some people believe teaching children at home is best for child development while others thing that it is important for your child to go to school discuss advantages of both and give your opinion. 73
- Question- Children can learn effectively by watching television.Therefore they should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some teachers are responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91375291375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82571414574 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554778554779 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0828448699 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8125 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118089673073 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375433815295 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442457310437 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810873114673 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058282215109 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.