Global climate change is regarded as a severe problem. Who should take responsibilities governments, large companies or individuals? Please explain
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this matter should be solved by governments companies and individuals, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of people. I am inclined to believe that effective measures can be a plus to resolve this issue and I will elaborate this in further essay.
From a social standpoint, change in the climate due to the pollution or emission from factories can provide the world with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that demerits of creating health issue and birth to numerous diseases, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on environment change which discovered the influence of this problem on people’s health. Thus, the gas emission from vehicles and using products with packaging are biggest threat for the environmental pollution.
From a realm of the scientists, governments need to set up stringent rules and regulations for their citizens. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of setting new laws could relate to this reality that the merits of using public transport pertain to reduction in fossil fuels. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the upside of everyone’s part in mitigating this issue is correlated positively with the respect of climate change. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments to this side. I profoundly believe that collaborative steps by organisation, governments and individuals could alleviate this growing concern.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-23 | Baljinder Kaur | 85 | view |
| 2018-03-16 | jeanisaballais@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2017-07-04 | ariufa | 88 | view |
| 2017-07-03 | ariufa | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 85
- If you are assigned to work on climate change what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education to make people ready for employment.Agree or disagree. 80
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are rooted in the fact that demerits of creating health issue and birth to numer...
^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the biggest'.
Suggestion: are the biggest
...icles and using products with packaging are biggest threat for the environmental pollution....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56727272727 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17872265005 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4343767733 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08333333333 7.25397266985 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955936263957 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333113477818 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326769577171 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569489888785 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275318880457 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.