Illiterate of the future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative impact on future society due to reading ability and the knowledge. It is possible to claim, that the future people will not read, my point of view that the future citizens use their brain rather than reading. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view, while analysing this idea to a great extent.
First and foremost, future students will not use their eyes to read, because of the technology that can directly speak with the brain. For example, there are newly released films, which has telecasted by Hollywood, have published this concept throughout the world with their films. Because of the above point, people believe that the future people will not read, but they increase their brain drain and brain capacity to handle new things such as new innovations.
On the other hand, those who believe that the future generation as fools have a different point of view and say, computes will control the world, and most of the people will rest their lives. For instants, a famous book "Future of almost everything" has published this idea very clearly throughout the globe. Therefore, it is taken in to account that the future people will never use their brain for learning. But, most of the above ideas are just virtual, and anyone has not proven scientifically.
In conclusion, it is believed that the next generations will not read, but they use and improve their learning skills. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that the professionals and government's participation are essential for future planning in a methodical manner.
- Positive and negative impact of information through Mass Media. Discuss your opinion. 85
- As a result of advance in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive, development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 55
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions orideas to take any decisions. Discuss 77
- Should English be the universal language? Discuss 77
- The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a methodical manner" with adverb for "methodical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ation are essential for future planning in a methodical manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0401459854 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536251698 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536496350365 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5650782775 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141501996628 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566006647966 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412950993243 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911486838137 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138182074285 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.