The responsibility for the protection of the environment is by the transnational organization or every country
As environmental pollution exacerbates the world over, the question of who assuming the responsibility of conservation of the environment is a controversial debate. It is believed that this responsibility will rest with international organizations. While it will be valid to a certain extent, I contend that environment issues are ultimately the duty of governments.
It is understandable why people advocate the view that addressing environmental problems is the sole responsibility of global organizations. The key rationale in this favor of this argument is that these institutions have many experts who major this aspect. Therefore, it is sensible that they should be given tasks of coming up with solutions to combat them. However, this thinking is flawed, as most transnational organizations do not enough funds to carry out these solutions. For example, global warming has been a thread of humans for many decades, so to order to ease this issue, a number of steps should be taken, including educating citizens about protecting their surroundings or even curbing emissions emitted, which are significantly costly for organizations to handle.
Instead of environmental groups alone, I side the view that these issues should have government interventions. Firstly, authorities should introduce " law" to limit toxic fumes discharges to rivers and atmosphere. In other ways, they should levy " green taxes" on car ownership whose carbon dioxide and mono dioxide are released to the environment, which likely encourages people to use public transport and use renewable energy. Environmental organizations do not have the authority to enact these policies, thus involving the governments is necessary. Moreover, states should allocate funds to efforts which aim to tackle these problems. For instance, authorities can invest in studies on renewable energy to make this power cheaper and more accessible to the public, which may decrease fuel consumption and air pollution.
In conclusion, there are many reasons to think that environmental protection should be addressed by the certain groups, I am of the opinion that states play a dispensable role in this enterprise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | farnaz.alireza | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | farnaz.alireza | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | Dung nguyen | 92 | view |
- Environment and solutions 89
- Should protect all animals or only some of them 42
- The average annual expenditure of college students from three countries 73
- The table compares the percentage of students who attended four different types of secondary schools in 2000, 2005, 2009. 67
- Car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'easing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: easing
...of humans for many decades, so to order to ease this issue, a number of steps should be...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59159159159 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31501608956 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600600600601 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3358138998 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.133333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152879668279 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461142398349 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479937631614 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897781044825 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540965361808 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.