Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the advantages and disadvantages of video calls among doctors and patients to diagnose a disease. Some people think that video calling can act as a benefitial tool between doctors and patients, while others maintain that a disease cannot be accurately diagnosed via video calls. This essay will discuss the disadvantages of video calling in medical domain to cure a disease.
At the outset, there are myriad of negative arguments associated with use of video call between doctors and patients. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the right diagnosis of the disease. Medicine is a profession which not only entails direct interaction between doctor and patient but also requires close visual physical inspection of the disease or wound. For instance, a dermatologist cannot write his opinion about a skin disease until physical examined and checked. As a result, it is quite evident that diseases cannot be accurately diagnosed on video communication.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that doctors need to inspect other vitals to precisely know about the disease. Therefore, check up of other vitals that require specialized medical apparatus cannot be carried out on video calls. As an example, in video call, a doctor would be unable to use a stethoscope or BP machine to inspect the chest or blood pressure of the patient. As a matter of fact, for accurate medical diagnoses and cure,a patient needs to be tested via allied equipment which cannot be done on a video call.
To recapitulate, aforementioned discussion propounds that video calling between doctors and patients has more disadvantages than advantages as physical inspection and checkup by ancillary equipment cannot be carried out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- After being involved in an accident you were looked after by a person you did not know before Write a special thank you letter to express your gratitude In your letter Introduce yourself and let him her know why you are writing Express your appreciation A 73
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 77
- The university will deduct the student s score for late assignments opinions and solutions Or Should University penalize students for late submission of their work 67
- Leaders should let people take part in decision making. Do you agree or disagree 60
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ately diagnosed on video communication. On the other hand, another pivotal facet...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
... for accurate medical diagnoses and cure,a patient needs to be tested via allied e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87587211678 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7456409727 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205249005264 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838276983708 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400778047907 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140221954601 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309771229798 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.