land for human needs or endangered animals
The earth is now witnessing a controversial issue in the using and saving of land. There is no denying that land use if essential to the development of human society. If no more land is available for people to explore, the living space will no longer endure the pressure from growth in population. On the other hand, if the land that animals inhabit is invaded by humans, an increasing number will reach the verge of extinction. Consequently, the ecological balance will be severely disrupted. Thus, only through having a good balance between land use and land conservation can such a dilemma be solved.
To begin with, land use ensures further development for human society. It involves the management and modification of wild land into areas for human needs. As many as seven billion people live on this planet today. To satisfy the most fundamental demand of the growing population, land ought to be used properly. For instance, if there is not enough supply of farmland, fewer crops can be harvested for food. This will increase the number of starving people in the world. The same is true with land for residential use. No one wishes to witness the rootless existence of those who are not settled down due to the lack of living space. In addition, the construction of commercial districts and public open spaces as well as the creation of industrial parks are all major projects that make a society advance towards a higher level. Evidently, the use of land is of essential importance to the survival of humankind and the advancement of human society.
Without a doubt, human should also shoulder the responsibility to protect animals from dying out. Endangered species like jaguars, leopards, brown bears, giant pandas and tigers are disappearing at an alarming rate due to the overuse of land and deforestation. Ancient ecosystem is being disturbed during human’s excessive exploitations. Such problems have intensified over recent years with unprecedented population growth and urbanization. Thriving and healthy environment is of vital importance to people’s well-being, but it is met with potential crisis owing to the extinction of rare animals. If more endangered animals are extinct, so will humankind soon or later. As valuable inhabitants on this planet, animals, especially those in danger of extinction, should never be deprived of a space to live and thrive. In a sense, saving land for these animals is equal to saving their lives.
Therefore, the government should seek to order and regulate land use in an efficient and ethical way. It is also imperative to make cautious plans to maintain the balance between using and saving land. Meanwhile, assessing the land potential and searching for alternatives for land use are also favorable options for the government. In doing so, the needs of human can be ensured and natural resources can be safeguarded.
To sum up, the harmony between human and nature is of vital importance in the modern world today. Land management is by no means an easy task. It involves all-round consideration and foresight. Excessive exploitation ought to be strictly prohibited. To use the land cautiously while protecting the endangered animals is a wise choice. Indeed, the far-reaching advancement of a society owes much to a well=balanced social and natural environment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-18 | memi00 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | Huge Jackman | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | Attia Yaqoob | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-19 | Safa Arshad | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | Greatness | 73 | view |
- children should not be allowed to play computer games 73
- People should not pay for public transportation agree disagree 95
- land for human needs or endangered animals 73
- are students more influenced by teachers than by their friends? 90
- children should not be allowed to play with computer games, because playing computer games is a waste of time 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crops is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... For example, less farmland results in less crops for human. This is a terrible cri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2652.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00377358491 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8048577096 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48679245283 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9424060388 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.60263145287 0.236089414692 255% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168941409684 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151058977892 0.0737576698707 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397747887545 0.150856017488 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733694985595 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.