In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you think this is realistic in our life today? To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the combination of learning and employment at the same time has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Is this realistic in our life today?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that an effective study needs comfort and time. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, an effective study is bound up inextricably with a peaceful environment, which indicates they lead to both cognitive skills and learning abilities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between academic performances and part-time jobs as well as an exponential increase in poor results. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of theoretical courses is correlated positively with not only extra works but also learning processes.
Within the realm of socio-economy, without the slightest doubt, students employment attribute to children's rights, in that it would come down to career opportunities, discriminations, and wages. A salient example of such attribution is realistic concepts, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take work pressures for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint employees' anxiety problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to employers, educational distractions, and even job dissatisfactions. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of working and learning at the same time.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that full-time employment may distract students studies. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- The time people devote in jobs leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 85
- The world's governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution. 88
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 84
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...rs have had the opportunity to pinpoint employees anxiety problems. Likewise, hardly had ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74657534247 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3200672716 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671232876712 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2365630209 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241850090279 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681439024706 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690245404201 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137579481361 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797504435023 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.