Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the hazards in our environment have been gaining a great deal of attention around the world. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding who will be responsible for resolving it. Some experts say, it must be considered globally, while others suggest, only national level activities will be more result-driven. There are strong arguments on both sides, however, which we will discuss here.
On one hand, it is inevitable that governmental bodies of the country can create new laws and implement at the national level. For this reason, the process of saving nature will be invigorated. Furthermore, public awareness programs, undertaken by national authorities, can also have a profound positive impact on nature. Therefore, the condition will be drastically improved having a positive impact nationally as well as globally. Bangladesh, for example, has introduced a new law of banning two-stroke driven vehicles from the streets and launched a vigorous awareness program to alleviate air pollution.
Conversely, international initiatives also play some role in this menace which includes creating new laws and treaties between the countries. This will, therefore, minimize environmental hazards owing to man-made causes like industrialization, logging, deforestation etc. In addition, these associations may also compel the hazard-making countries to compensate the sufferer nations, although, these agreements are not effective in most of the cases. For example, Bangladesh, a South Asian small country, seeking compensation from the high carbon-emitting countries like China, USA and unfortunately, they have not been paid yet due to the international red tape.
All things considered, we, the inhabitants of the world, are in the brink of irreversible damage of our nature. I personally believe, initiatives to save our environment should be adopted by industrialized nations and it will generate a positive impact as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Bilal-88 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | D87eepak | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-18 | JimmyMcgill | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | aratanpal | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | ahsan.ca707 | 56 | view |
- Recommendation letter 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- You are organizing an executive event for the company you work for. Write a letter to the person in charge of a venue that you are considering for the event and ask for detailed information about regarding dates, services and costs. 89
- Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.? 61
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times. What are the advantages for a company of having a uniform? Are there any benefits of having a uniform for the staff? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, however, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65666666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29995791219 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646666666667 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1287820012 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0828283538234 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286192620066 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340802357145 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521518347344 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427420021369 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.