People’s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surrounding than by society as a whole.
People’s attitude can be shaped by various factors. Some people have notion that people’s thoughts and stance is determined by immediate surroundings. Others adopt a different view and advocate that society as a whole determines people’s thoughts. While the former statement is true to some extent, it is latter that is corroborated by practical evidence.
People’s thoughts is shaped by the immediate situation if that situation affects a larger mass or large number of people. People perceive something as significant if it has impacted numerous people. In 2012, massive earthquake hit Nepal which had devastating effect, taking many lives and inviting many casaulties. After that event, the tourism sector was severely affected: the number of tourists arriving in Nepal declined sharply in the following years. Peoples attitude towards Nepal changed; they considered Nepal to be unsafe place to visit and deemed it unwise to visit Nepal. Their attitude shifted due to a major event which had affected larger mass of people.
However, it is the society as a whole that has major impact in determining people’s attitude in the long run. People thoughts and stance are usually rigid and doesn’t change overnight: it requires much time and is changed only after much time and effort. Society plays a key role is shaping a person’s thought. Marriage of same sex was considered unethical and even illegal during past time. People treated homosexuality as taboo and treated homosexuals with contempt. Alan Turin, who had played integral part in code-breaking efforts in world war II, was convicted of homosexuality; He commited suicide after two years of conviction. After decades of struggle and movements, marriage of same sex was legalized only recently. Though it seems an immediate event, it took herculean effort and time. People’s attitude towards marriage of same sex changed, LGBT were considered as normal as othercitizens and marriage of same sex was also reverred.
Society’s stance has changed the attitude of people towards racial inequality in America. In past, Society considered people with black skin to be inferior and the people’s attitude towards black colored people was wanton. Through various movements, the society changed. The movement by Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King helped alleviate racial injustice in USA; people’s thoughts about racial injustice also changed.It took a great deal of time for the paradigm shift of people about racial inequality and it was only possible because of the change in stance of society towards it.
Many would argue that immediate surrounding shapes peopl’s thoughts and perception. However, in the long term, it is society as a whole that has a determining role is shaping people’s attitude and perception.
- Government should focus it's attention in immediate problem rather than anticipated problems of future. 58
- People’s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surrounding than by society as a whole. 50
- Government should provide free college and university education to all the students. 62
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- True success lies in rejecting the familiar things. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...dered unethical and even illegal during past time. People treated homosexuality as taboo ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...e towards racial inequality in America. In past, Society considered people with black s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...hts about racial injustice also changed.It took a great deal of time for the parad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47945205479 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97887378702 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8993795724 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.52 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.12 5.21951772744 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382407610596 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122344662576 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110999077033 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249552777737 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868254614323 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.