Design of buildings have postive or negative impact on people's life and work.
Now in the modern era, for some people believe that design of buildings is important because it has positive impact on people work or life. While, others think that it is not important because it has negative impact on people. I will shed light on both views in upcoming paragraphs before appropriate conclusion.
On the one hand, design of the buildings make by architect and there are many competition in every country to become architect in life or many have dream to become architect in future. Furthermore, in past few decades no matter how the building was design but nowadays every people see the buildings how buildings were made. Every good buildings make by a good or experience architect. The design of building matter like many countries known by their buildings like Paris known by Eiffel Tower or U.S.A known by Statue Of Liberty. These buildings are help to increase the tourism and when the tourism increases the economy growth also increases wich is benefit for country this is the main point of positive impact of buildings in people life.
Nevertheless, buildings design also have some negative impact on human life or work. Some people not see the buildings the only focus on our work. Also, for some individuals to design the big buildings is only a waste of money.
To recapitulate, every things have some positive and negative impact on human life. This, essay is also contain positive and negative impact on people. But, positive impact is more the negative because it helps to people as well s helps to our country.
- pros and cons of extreme sports. 11
- Sports and games create disturbance in student's life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 55
- “Normal” societal roles for women include taking care of the children in the household. But now that women contribute equally in outdoor responsibilities, it would be a little unfair to expect the same amount of dedication towards the upbringing of th 55
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of he 55
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent year. What solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...modern era, for some people believe that design of buildings is important because...
^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun competition seems to be countable; consider using: 'many competitions'.
Suggestion: many competitions
...ildings make by architect and there are many competition in every country to become architect in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dreamed', 'dreamt'.
Suggestion: dreamed; dreamt
...o become architect in life or many have dream to become architect in future. Furtherm...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... or many have dream to become architect in future. Furthermore, in past few decades no ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...like Paris known by Eiffel Tower or U.S.A known by Statue Of Liberty. These build...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89353612167 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51831039819 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471482889734 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6539780773 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9285714286 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461509722151 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177272007931 0.0925447433944 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122908050218 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305548295073 0.151781067708 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565390372131 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.