The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The given table illustrates the proportion of boys divided into two age groups who took part in five particular sports in Britain in 2010.
Overall, in both two shown age groups, while football which was played by the majority of male students made up the largest proportion, the opposite was true for swimming. Additionally, the percentage of boys from 6 to 11 who tend to play sports was strictly higher than their counterparts from 12 to 16, except for the same percentage of swimming.
Regarding the 6-11 age group, the rate of boys playing football was highest, at 87%, followed by the significant lower figure for cricket, at 45%, and basketball, at 35%. Meanwhile, those playing rugby and swimming were the lowest, at 23% and 19% respectively.
For the male students from 12 to 16, the percentage of boys taking part in football was also the most prevalent sports, at 78%. Moreover, in comparison with the 6-11 age group, the roughly 10% lower was witnessed in the figures for three out of five categories which were football, basketball and cricket. By contrast, the figures for rugby and swimming which were around one-fifth were approximately the same as the remaining group.
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on of the treatment of those who are already ill.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.985 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7345520657 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7717882399 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206121394827 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969625383709 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834387440983 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152387306882 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854411341888 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.