Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
A person residing in a foreign country definitely experiences several adjustment problems ranging from culture to daily interaction. These hardships might be caused by language barrier. From my point of view, I agree that incorrect foreign language usage can lead to severe issues based on some considerations below.
It is obvious that many distinctive practical problems arise from language barrier. First of all, learning capacity of an individual could be limited due to lack of comprehension or breakdown in understanding. For instance, when a foreigner studies abroad without being fluent in native language of the host country , it may take him a long time to thoroughly understand the lessons and to keep up with others. Besides, daily activities such as grocery shopping or travelling become more difficult than usual because of language barrier. People may struggle to convey message or get correct directions, which makes it frustrated for both sides.
Seriously, having to speak a foreign language can provoke social problems. Ineffective communication can hinder a relationship sustainably. The speakers find it challenging to express their ideas and form bonds with others, which makes them fail to integrate with the rest of the group. If the problems worsen exponentially, it can lead to aggressive reactions. In some multiracial countries such as America, the violence happened between native and non-native speakers has rang alarm bells.
In conclusion, not fluent in a language when living abroad can cause social issue and pragmatic concern. Therefore, in the integration era, more solution should be applied to minimize the consequences of the language barrier
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sepide1367 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | olParya | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Nimaianp75 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Varpuleva | 78 | view |
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinionWhat sort of punishment should parents and t 89
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t in native language of the host country , it may take him a long time to thorough...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'expressing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: expressing
...nably. The speakers find it challenging to express their ideas and form bonds with others,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'rung'.
Suggestion: rung
...ween native and non-native speakers has rang alarm bells. In conclusion, not fluen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50965250965 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02460080989 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664092664093 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5540087481 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208505634496 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712308680677 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825334595485 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124303763941 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367971194413 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.