An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
Technology has advanced to a new level over the past few years. Tablets and laptops which were luxurious gadgets once are now easy to own. Many schools are following this trend of using an electronic medium to teach students replacing them with paper-based products. In this essay, we will discuss the positive and negative impacts of children using gadgets in schools compared to books.
Children today are extremely capable of adapting to the new technology development compared to kids a decade back. Most of the children today know how to operate a Pc or tablet. Schools can provide students with a digital copy of each lecture that is conducted in schools so that they can refer to them when required. For example, in a classroom when a maths problem is solved and the students did not understand how it solved he can come back home and refer his tablet once again and clear his doubts. Moreover, if a student is sick and cannot attend the school he still can access the missed class through his laptop and tablet because the school uploads all the classes to each student account.
On the other hand, kids can misuse the tablet and laptops by using them to play games. Instead of doing home works and studying students will use them for other activities which might impact their studies. It is essential that kids are monitored on what they are using the laptop and tablet. For example, students can watch movies, play games, and browse the internet and this will lead to poor performance in his studies. Another disadvantage is that too much strain will be there on students eyes because they are always watching the laptop and studying.
In conclusion, the use of technology for studies purpose will greatly benefit the students. There can humongous source of educational contents online which the kids can access. But it should also be watched that they utilize these gadgets only for educational purpose and not for entertainment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | sahilrocks11 | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | sharath957 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-29 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | anuu1989 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state.Do you agree or disagree with the above notion? 56
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema. 80
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach art subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 73
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent doyou agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'kid'.
Suggestion: kid
... new technology development compared to kids a decade back. Most of the children tod...
^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...red. For example, in a classroom when a maths problem is solved and the students did ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90332326284 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44889720228 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534743202417 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5529430697 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277502974604 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882282508225 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637041433827 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162352175993 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613183563779 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.