It is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medical research. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Human have killed animals for ages for their personal gains and needs. I agree to a certain extend that these creatures are not required for majority of human requirements today, however for certain requirement we still depend on animals.
From stone age people have been hunting animals for feeding on them, and afterward using their skins as fur. Those days these furs were used in order to protect them from harsh weather. However, even today we prey on these beasts for our nutritious benefits and the furs of these poor animals have now become as a fashion statement. It is high time that these animals are protected from human tortures. In fact, organisation like PETA and WWE should educate people about the effect of killing these creatures for our personal benefits. In the medical field too, there is a drastic decrease in the use of animals for their testing’s compared to a few years back.
Today many people depend on non-vegetarian dishes mainly for their taste and their nutritious value. For example, 200 grams of chicken gives us 75 grams of protein to our body, no other vegetarian product can supplement this meat for the nutrition we get. Moreover, people in coastal area catch fishes for free from the coast and fishes are known for various health benefits. Most of the fishing people live in below poverty and this is only a source of healthy food they can afford because it’s free.
Medical field has been growing rapidly. Today we have medicines for different types of health issues which were not available a decade back. Research is the main reason for finding new cures for various diseases and this has been possible because of testing them on animals first.
In conclusion, animals have been useful to humans for their different requirements. However, we should also consider that they are also a part of the nature and we not use them for our fashion needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-09 | sharath957 | 82 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Shopping has become a favorite pastime among young people. Why do you think it is like that, and do you think they must be encouraged to do other things rather than shopping? 56
- Some people argue that a growing number of young people spend too much time in watching TV Why does this phenomenon happen And what kinds of activities should be encouraged to them 42
- More and more people are opting for ready made food instead of freshly cooked food. Do this development has more advantage over disadvantage. 84
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach art subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...l gains and needs. I agree to a certain extend that these creatures are not required f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4038831437 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5367381057 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197656186716 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073411834789 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387318574635 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120413729533 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151230156663 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.