Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
now as in the past public libraries have been a vital element in modern society, unfortunately, the maintenance of them is being considered a financial waste for the government due to current the technologies like the internet are supplying similar services to the community. I strongly agree with this viewpoint and in this essay, I will give my reasons.
Firstly, emerging technologies as the internet, virtual libraries, and digital books have been moving out old sources of information like physical books, newspapers and journals, because of their easy and quick accessibility, for instance, people could have access to the history of "Area 51" which was a highly restricted a decade ago, using simply a mobile phone from anywhere around the world. Furthermore, new technologies could supply more information than public libraries, but, that is not the only function of a public library in society.
However, public libraries are not only a source of information, but they are also more than that now. due to the emerging computer technologies, libraries have become part of our historical infrastructures, and a quiet place where people could go to study or read. for example, a survey made in Boston university displayed that many university students still prefer to go to the libraries to plan a design digital presentation, rather than make them in their own places. Hence, public libraries still have enormous value in our current society.
To conclude, despite the new technologies have displaced the public libraries as a source of information, it does not mean that public libraries do not have the importance for society as to be considered as a public waste of money, on the contrary, I truly believe, they are still giving to the society something that technology cannot supply yet, historical memory for the community and proper environment to study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | davidlvg1108 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
- Crime rate in most countries is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas Why do you think that it is What can be done to reduce the crime rate 86
- Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel. For this reason, attention should be given to colour schemes when decorating places such as offices and hospitals.How true this statement? How far colours influence people 56
- Many people today use their mobile phones for sending texts more than talking What are the reasons for this Are there more advantages than disadvantages 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your ow 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
now as in the past public libraries have be...
^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople could have access to the history of 'Area 51' which was a highly r...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
..., but they are also more than that now. due to the emerging computer technologies, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...where people could go to study or read. for example, a survey made in Boston univer...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26821192053 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99660824596 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.397312503 49.4020404114 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.777777778 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5555555556 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21084765423 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886394039289 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502674087531 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13132816075 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408447858418 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.