The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999.
The table reports the number of cars passing three outskirt roads between 1993 and 2002 and depicts the influence of Traffic Calming into Harper Lane in 1999. This is measured by cars per hours using 10 pollution monitor programs during weekdays.
Overall, despite some fluctuations, the amount of traffic showed a steady increase during the period given. As the introducing of traffic calming, Harper Lane succeeded to support the least number of cars at the end of the period.
Initially, the Great York Way was the busiest road, accounting as much 600 cars per hours, and for the first half of the period, the figure for the similar road fluctuated with declining slightly as an overall trend. Long Lane following the same trend increased almost double from 1993 figure by 300 cars per hour. Although the least car passed the Harper Lane in 1993, the road then experienced a dramatic increase, reaching 915 cars per hours as the highest level in 1998.
By early 1999, implementing traffic calming had resulted in a dramatic decline of traffic in the Harper Lane as much a quarter from the previous year, but the car through the road grew slightly in 2001 onwards. While the program had no effect into the other roads, the amount of traffic for them continued to grow until remaining unchanged at the end of the period with 900 cars/hour for Great York Way and 1400 cars/hour for Long Lane.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-16 | aldryan.wb | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Indri Eka Putri | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | ymyhcd | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | Sharma Saab | 67 | view |
| 2016-12-15 | elnuroruclu | 87 | view |
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for the urban population in different world regions. 84
- Life expectancy is increasing. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 56
- water treatment 89
- The groups below show the trends in three boys and girls names which are currently popular in the UK 79
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3554753 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5857052955 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411603673917 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179452302346 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707333924105 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264168213065 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901049348508 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.