Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
Nowadays, successful companies are to be quicker and smarter when planning their strategies. Some people believe that employees should be part of the decisions while others believe those decisions should be taken by higher authorities. This essay will discuss why companies decisions should be held by their employees.
Firstly, the decision making process among companies has become to be more accurate and faster. Low level employees are in the front line of the companies and are aware what problems make harder to negotiate with clients. For example, a real state agent who participates in open houses. Obviously, this employee has experience and practical knowledge to give more accurate suggestions on how to solve problems that affect negotiations in a faster way.
Secondly, Intelligent and fast decisions are required when planning strategies of lucrative businesses. Employees of those companies are motivated when being part of strategic decisions are able to come up with better ideas in a fraction of time. For example, Facebook workers who came up with the idea of a successful new up in a matter of 5 hours. Certainly, those employees had been highly motivated for collaborating with the strategic decisions of the company.
Strategies should be rapidly adopted and covers all issues among companies. In my opinion, employees should be involved in all important decisions and strategies taken by companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | andrefreitas | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | andrefreitas | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | cur_zii | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | vishal4a3 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 72
- “Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice then eating meat”Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 55
- What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success 83
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...people believe that employees should be part of the decisions while others believe t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39013452915 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89547232401 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560538116592 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7096099793 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185105920293 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688383248755 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488557957678 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112814122462 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362147723693 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.