Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion
In this day and ages, whether the traditional teaching method or online learning is superior has caused a heated debate. Personally, I believe giving lectures in halls in front of lots of students is, by far, more beneficial.
First, there is little room for doubt that the conventional way of teaching with frequent face-to-face interaction is of paramount importance to the progress of each student. This is because, a human teacher rather than a robot, plays a critical role as, not only, a lecturer passing on knowledge and skills, but a partner who can recognize student’s strengths and weaknesses and provide support when in need. To illustrate, I used to be a student who often received low marks in Math, but thanks to all repetitious elaboration and encouragement from my head teacher, I managed to pass the final exam with flying colors.
Second, presenting lectures solely online also presents problems of students not being motivated to keep watching full videos. It would be too tough to manage who is actually viewing the lesson and if students know this, they are prone to play truant by just leaving the computer on and consequently not well-prepared for exams. For instance, Edumall, a leading Internet-based learning company, found that only 12% of customers who purchased online courses, strictly followed the duration of each video, principally due to lack of sufficient supervision.
Granted, it also true that learning via a computer is advantageous to many people, who cannot regularly attend lesson in traditional classrooms. As a result, it may enable them to access knowledge, but saving time and money. However, the outcome of this method is still limited.
In conclusion, it is my belief that attending lectures in auditoriums with large numbers of other students can greatly benefit the progress of leaners and reduce the drop-off possibility in student attendance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | parwintalwin14 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Buithilanphuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Adithya999 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 78
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to company'
Suggestion: to company
...mall, a leading Internet-based learning company, found that only 12% of customers who p...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ficient supervision. Granted, it also true that learning via a computer is advanta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22875816993 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97935998639 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650326797386 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6614581021 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142106098795 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466828867259 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453247865769 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757928961095 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453647320856 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.